The presentation I intend to deliver offers an introductory analysis of the substantialist logical framework of Huìzǐ (惠子) and Gōngsūn Lóng (公孫龍), whose predicative structure operates based on the rectification of names (zhèng míng, 正名) and the separation between name (míng, 名) and substance (shí, 實). In the argument “a white horse is not a horse” (bái mǎ fēi mǎ, 白馬非馬), we observe a logic of categorical exclusion aimed at fixing conceptual identities through formal distinctions between subject and predicate. Zhuāngzǐ (莊子), especially in the Qíwùlùn (齊物論), the second chapter of the Zhuāngzǐshū (莊子書), deconstructs this ontology through an inter-relational logic that reveals the inseparability via the interdependence of opposites as an epistemological horizon. In place of the rigidity of discriminative discourse (biàn, 辯), Zhuāngzǐ (莊子) proposes an opening through an ontological deconstructive logic, in which míng (名) (name, language) and shí (實) (substance, reality) are not phenomena in themselves, but relational flows within an interdependent network. The critical analysis not only deconstructs the logic of the School of Names (Míngjiā, 名家), but also redirects the flow of epistemological construction toward an ontology of inter-relational flux and mutually determined identity.